Vanity Publishing will Rescue the Print Media

>other web sites. This is the Yahoo! formula.
Vanity print publishing is the last hope of a dyingContent generated by the authors has thus
industry.transformed Ploughshares into a leading literary
The circulation of print magazines has declinedportal.
precipitously in the last few years. This dissolutionBut Ploughshares did not stop at this standard
of subscriber bases has accelerated dramaticallyfeatures. A "bookshelf" links to book reviews
as economic recession set in. But a diminishingcontributed online (and augmented by the
wealth effect is only partly to blame. Themagazine's own prestigious offerings). An
managements of printed periodicals - from dailiesannotated bookstore is just a step away (though
to quarterlies - failed miserably to grasp thePloughshares' web site does not include one
Internet's potential and potential threat. Theyhitherto). The next best thing is a
were fooled by the lack of friendly and cheaprights-management application used by the
e-reading devices into believing that old habits diejournal's authors to grant online publishing
hard. They do - but magazine reading is not habitpermissions for their work to third parties.
forming. Readers' loyalties are fickle and shiftNo print literary magazine can beat this one stop
according to content and price. The Web offersshop. So, how can print publications defend
cornucopian and niche-targeted content free ofthemselves?
charge or very cheaply. This is hard to beat andBy being creative and by not conceding defeat is
is getting harder by the day as natural selectionhow.
among dot.bombs spares only quality contentConsider WuliWeb's example of thinking outside
providers.the printed box. Its timing was bad —
Still, the print media rely on a defunct businessimmediately preceding the bursting of the bubble.
model: ad-financed content aggregation. ContentBut, the idea was sound.
producers (known as journalists or reporters) areWuliweb (owned by AirClic) is a simple online
paid for their professional work (their writings).application which enables its users to "send, save
Editors then assemble this output and homogenizeand share material from print publications".
it. Finally, these articles and op-ed pieces find theirParticipating magazines and newspapers print
predestined place in rigid, spatially-delimited rubrics"WuliCodes" on their (physical) pages and WuliWeb
in the paper or magazine. Both pillars of thissubscribers barcode-scan, or manually enter them
strategy are crumbling: advertising dollars haveinto their online "Content Manager" via keyboard,
shifted decisively “below the line” (intoPDA, pager, cell phone, or fixed phone (using a
word-of-mouth and loyalty campaigns, forPIN). The service is free (paid for by the
instance) and content is now prodigiouslymagazine publishers and advertisers) and,
produced by prolific bloggers and what CNN callsaccording to WuliWeb, offers these advantages
iReporters. Vanity online publishing trumpedto its users:
traditional print publishing."Once you choose to use WuliWeb's free service,
The print media should jump on the wagon: theyyou will no longer have to laboriously 'tear and
should solicit contributions from citizen journalists,share' print articles or ads that you want to
bloggers, i-reporters, and e-columnists. Thesearchive or share with colleagues or friends. You
content providers are likely to be satisfied with awill be able to store material sourced from print
mere byline for their remuneration (seeing theirpublications permanently in your own secure,
name in print!) Having thus cut their costs byelectronic files, and you can share this material
leveraging the public’s vanity, newspapersinstantly with any number of people. Magazine and
and magazines will be able to concentrate onNewspaper Publishers will now have the ability to
customer relations (via their internet propertiesdistribute their online content more widely and to
and social networking tools) and on what they dooffer a richer experience to their readers.
best: coherent aggregation, contextualAdvertisers will be able to deploy dynamic and
commentary, and communal branding.media-rich content to attract and convert
Outside the box, there are other solutions andcustomers, and will be able to communicate more
models.completely with their customers."
Consider Ploughshares, the Literary Journal.Links to the shared material are stored in
It is a venerable, not for profit, print journalWuliWeb's central database and users gain access
published by Emerson College, now marking itsto them by signing up for a (free) WuliWeb
37th anniversary. A few years ago, it inauguratedaccount. Thus, the user's mailbox is unencumbered
its web sibling. The project consumed three yearsby huge downloads. Moreover, WuliWeb allows for
and $125,000 (a grant from the Wallace-Reader'sa keywords-based search of articles saved.
Digest Funds). Every title Ploughshares has everPerhaps the only serious drawback is that
published was indexed (over 18,000 journal pagesWuliWeb provides its users only with LINKS to
digitized). In all, the "website offers free access tocontent stored on publishers' web sites. It is a
over 3,500 poems and short stories from pastdirectory service - not a full text database. This
and current issues".creates dependence. Links may get broken. Whole
The more than 2000 (!) authors ever published inweb sites vanish. Magazines and their publishers go
Ploughshares maintain a personal web pagesunder. All the more reason for publishers to
comprising biographical notes, press releases, newrevive this service and make it their own.
books and events announcements and links to