| INDUSTRY ANALYSIS | | | | industry, and product differences are among the |
| *Shanmukha Rao. Padala **Dr. N. V.S. | | | | factors fostering brand identification. |
| Suryanarayana | | | | 3. Capital Requirements – The need to invest |
| INTRODUCTION: | | | | large financial resources in order to compete |
| Industry and competition are | | | | creates a barrier to entry, particularly if the capital |
| the main constituents of the task environment of | | | | is required for unrecoverable expenditure. |
| a business firm. The environmental survey will not | | | | 4. Cost Disadvantages Independent of Size – |
| be complete without industry analysis and | | | | Entrenched companies may have cost |
| competitor analysis. Analysis of macro | | | | advantages not available to potential rivals, no |
| environment gives rise to common information | | | | matter what their size and attainable economies |
| whereas Industry Aanalysis provides structural | | | | of scale. These advantages can stem from the |
| realities, specific and unique information, which are | | | | effects of the learning, proprietary technology, |
| required for strategy formulation. Industry analysis | | | | access to the best raw materials, sources, assets |
| brings to light the industry attractiveness and the | | | | purchased at pre-inflation prices or favourable |
| firm's competitive position within the industry. The | | | | locations. |
| indusrty's attractiveness is mainly determined by | | | | 5. Access to Distribution Channels – The new |
| its growth potential and inherent profitability of of | | | | entrants must of course secure distribution of his |
| the industry. Analysis of industry and competition | | | | product or service. The more limited the |
| helps not only strategy formulation but also helps | | | | wholesale or retail cannels are and the more that |
| in building competitive advantage. | | | | existing competitors have these tied up, obviously |
| Michael E. Porter's book " | | | | the tougher that entry into the industry will be. |
| Competitive Strategy" propelled the concept of | | | | Sometimes this barrier is so high that, to |
| industry analysis into the foreground of strategic | | | | surmount it, a new contestant must create its |
| thought and business planning. His well defined | | | | own distribution channels. |
| analytical framework helps strategic managers to | | | | 6. Government Policy – The government can |
| understand industry dynamics and to correctly | | | | limit or even foreclose entry to industries with |
| anticipate the impact of remote factors on a | | | | such controls as license requirements and limits on |
| firm's operating environment. | | | | access to raw materials. The government also |
| The nature and degree of | | | | can play a major indirect role by affecting entry |
| competition in an industry hinge on five forces: the | | | | barriers through controls such as air and water |
| threat of new entrants, the bargaining power of | | | | pollution standards and safety regulations. |
| customers, the bargaining power of suppliers, the | | | | |
| threat of substitute products or services, and the | | | | 2. Powerful suppliers and buyers: |
| jockeying among current contestants. | | | | Suppliers can exert bargaining |
| | | | | power on participants in an industry by raising |
| FRAME WORK FOR INDUSRTY ANALYSIS: | | | | prices or reducing the quality of purchased goods |
| The following framework, | | | | and services. Powerful suppliers can thereby |
| which consists of seven aspects, is helpful to do | | | | squeeze profitability out of an industry unable to |
| industry analysis. | | | | recover cost increases in its own prices. |
| 1. Basic Conditions: Under general/basic conditions, | | | | Customers likewise can force |
| product categories, performance of the industry | | | | down prices, demand higher quality or more |
| in recent years and size of the industry are | | | | service, and play competitors off against each |
| considered. Before 1980 the Indian passenger car | | | | other – all at the expense of industry profits. |
| industry was oligopolistic, industry size was small | | | | The power of each important |
| and licensing system was used as an entry | | | | supplier or buyer group depends on a number of |
| barrier. Customer service and quality of vehicles | | | | characteristics of its market situation and on the |
| were lesser-known aspects. The industry | | | | relative importance of its sales or purchases to |
| operated with limited players in a regulated | | | | the industry compared with its overall business. |
| protected environment. In 1980 Maruti entered | | | | A company's choice of |
| the Indian passenger car industry. The post | | | | suppliers to buy from or buyer groups to sell |
| liberalization period witnessed the entry of several | | | | should be viewed as a crucial strategic decision. A |
| new players including MNCs. The industry went | | | | company can improve its strategic posture by |
| through growth phase and other players adopted | | | | finding suppliers or buyers who possess the least |
| new strategies. The demand for passenger cart | | | | power to influence it adversely. |
| was 15,714 in 1960. Within next two decades it | | | | Most common is the situation |
| increased to 30,989. The Compound Annual | | | | of a company being able to choose whom it will |
| Growth Rate rose from 3.50% to 18.60% in 1983. | | | | sell to in other words, buyer selection, Rarely do |
| 2. Industry Setting/ Environment: Michael Porter | | | | all the buyer groups a company sells to enjoy |
| classified industries on the environment. | | | | equal power. |
| - Fragmented industry | | | | |
| - Emerging industry | | | | 3. Substitute Products |
| - Transition to maruti | | | | By placing a ceiling on prices it |
| - Declining industry | | | | can charge, substitute products or services limit |
| - Global industry | | | | the potential of an industry. Unless it can upgrade |
| Industry settings must project the industry type | | | | the quality of the product or differentiate it |
| to which the firm belongs. With regard to Indian | | | | somehow, the industry will suffer in earnings and |
| passenger car industry, it is a growing industry | | | | possibly in growth. |
| and it is likely to have prolonged phase of growth. | | | | Substitutes not only limit profits |
| It employs 4,50,000 people directly and 10 million | | | | in normal times, they also reduce bonanza an |
| indirectly and it contributes 4% of GDP currently. | | | | industry can reap in boom times. |
| 1. Industry Structure: Till 1980, there were only | | | | 4. Jockeying for Position |
| two players in the passenger car industry namely | | | | Rivalry among existing |
| Hindustan Motors and Premier Auto Ltd. In 1980, | | | | competitors takes the familiar form of jockeying |
| Maruti entered the scene. With liberalization global | | | | for position – using tactics like price |
| car giants such as Suzuki, General Motors, Ford, | | | | competition, product introduction, and advertising. |
| Daewoo, Hyundai, Honda, Peugeot, Fiat, Mitsubishi, | | | | Intense rivalry is related to the presence of a |
| Daimler Benz and BMW entered the Indian market | | | | number of factors: |
| through joint venture route. Before 1980, licensing | | | | - Competitors are numerous or roughly equal in |
| policy served as an entry barrier. After 1980, | | | | size and power; |
| huge capital requirement, cost advantages and | | | | - Industry growth is slow, precipitating fights for |
| experience curve effect of early players like | | | | market share that involve expansion minded |
| Maruti proved to be an entry barrier for new | | | | members; |
| players. | | | | - Fixed costs are high or the product is perishable, |
| Industry structure is concerned with number of | | | | creating strong temptation to cut prices; |
| players, total market size, market share of | | | | - Exit barriers are high. Exit barriers keep |
| players, nature of competition, barriers, | | | | companies competing even though they may be |
| differentiation, and cost structure of players. | | | | earning low or even negative returns on |
| 1. Industry Attraction: Industry attractiveness is | | | | investment. |
| mainly determined by: industry potential, industry | | | | - The rivals are diverse in strategies, origins and |
| growth, industry profitability and forces shaping | | | | personalities. They have different ideas about how |
| competition. The demand for small car is | | | | to compete and continually run head – on into |
| increasing in India. The l;uxury car is the segment | | | | each other in the process. |
| where the demand is slowly on the rise in recent | | | | |
| times. The factors that determine profitability in | | | | EXPERIENCE CURVE AS AN ENTRY BARRIER: |
| passenger car industry are technology and | | | | In recent years, the |
| volume. All players have different models in all | | | | experience curve has become widely discussed as |
| market segments. The existing players Premier | | | | a key element of industry structure. According to |
| Auto Ltd., and Maruti put up defensive strategies. | | | | this concept, unit costs in many manufacturing |
| Cost reduction, reduction of delivery time, | | | | industries, as well as in some service industries |
| marketing network, auto financing by Citicorp, | | | | decline with experience of a particular company's |
| export orientation, price cutting, aggressive pricing | | | | cumulative volume of production. |
| policy, modernization, expansion and after sales | | | | The cost decline creates |
| service are notified in Indian passenger car | | | | barrier to entry because new competitors with no |
| industry. | | | | experience face higher costs than established |
| 2. Industry Performance: Performance of the | | | | ones, particularly the producer with the largest |
| industry is studied in terms of sales, profitability, | | | | market share, and have difficulty catching up with |
| production and technological advancement. The | | | | the largest market share, and have difficulty |
| compact car segment has witnessed several | | | | catching up with the entrenched competitors. |
| challenges Daewoo launched Matiz, and Hyundai | | | | Adherents of the experience |
| launched Santro. Indica launched by Tata Motors | | | | curve concept stress the importance of achieving |
| proved to be a world class low priced diesel car. | | | | market leadership to maximise this barrier to |
| Maruti experienced tough competition from Indica | | | | entry, and they recommend aggressive action to |
| and Indica reshaped Indian car market. A price | | | | achieve it, such as price cutting in anticipation of |
| war was unleashed by leading players. | | | | fallings costs in order to build volume. |
| Modernization of plants, export thrust, superior | | | | The height of the barrier |
| after sales service have been observed among all | | | | depends on how important costs are to |
| leading players. Now Tata Motors introduced | | | | competition compared with other areas like |
| ‘Nano' car at world least cost. | | | | marketing selling, and innovation. The barrier can |
| 3. Industry Practice: Industry practice refers to | | | | be nullified by product of process innovations |
| what majority of players in the industry does | | | | leading to a substantially new technology and |
| with distribution, pricing and R&D. joint | | | | thereby creating an entirely new experience |
| venture with MNC is an accepted industry practice | | | | curve. New entrants can leapfrog the industry |
| to ensure quality in passenger car industry. After | | | | leaders and alight on the new experience curve, |
| sales service centers are established by all leading | | | | to which those leaders may be poorly positioned |
| manufacturers. In recent times, Maruti has lost its | | | | to jump. |
| dominant position mainly because of the | | | | SWOT ANALYSIS: |
| aggressive attitude of new players. However it | | | | SWOT or WOTS is an |
| enjoys the cost advantage as it was established | | | | acronym for strengths, weakness, opportunities |
| in a regular environment. | | | | and threats underlying strategic planning process. |
| 4. Emerging Trends: The emerging trends are | | | | The purpose of strategic planning is to discover |
| examined by studying product life cycle, stage of | | | | future opportunities and threats so as to make |
| the industry, changes in buyer needs, and | | | | plans to exploit or avoid them, as the case may |
| innovation in products, process, and growth rate | | | | be, in the crucial step of strategy formulation. |
| and government policies. McKinsey consultants | | | | Though SWOT analysis should be undertaken as |
| have predicted 256 per cent growth in industry | | | | an integrated process in strategic management, it |
| production. The Ministry of Heavy Industries and | | | | has been broken into two parts because of the |
| Public Enterprises plans to double the contribution | | | | different nature of information requirement for |
| of auto industry by promoting exports. | | | | each. The first part is the environmental analysis |
| | | | | for identifying opportunities and threats, and the |
| How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy: | | | | second part is corporate appraisal for identifying |
| The essence of strategy | | | | strengths and weaknesses. |
| formulation is coping with competition. It is easy | | | | SWOT analysis begins with the |
| to view competition too narrowly and too | | | | appraisal of external environment so that the |
| pessimistically. Intense competition in an industry is | | | | organisation can analyse the various opportunities |
| neither coincidence nor bad luck. | | | | and threats offered by it and the organisation can |
| In the fight for market share, | | | | relate itself in the light of its strengths and |
| competition is not manifested only in the other | | | | weaknesses. From this point of view, managers |
| players. Rather, competition in an industry is | | | | should appraise the various organisational factors |
| rooted in its underlying economics, and | | | | through which it can cope up with its environment. |
| competitive forces exist that go well beyond the | | | | Such a process is known as corporate appraisal. |
| established combatants in a particular industry. | | | | Corporate appraisal is the process through which |
| Customers, suppliers, potential entrants and | | | | managers analyse the various factors of their |
| substitute products are all competitors that may | | | | organisation to evaluate their strengths and |
| be more or less prominent or active depending on | | | | weaknesses so as to meet the opportunities and |
| the industry. | | | | threats of environment. |
| The collective strength of | | | | |
| these forces determines the ultimate profit | | | | USEFULNESS OF INDUSTRY ANALYSIS: |
| potential of an industry. It ranges from intense in | | | | The basic purpose of industry |
| industries where no company earns spectacular | | | | analysis is to assess the relative strengths and |
| returns on investment, to mild in industries, where | | | | weakness of an organization relative to other |
| there is room for quick high returns. | | | | players in the industry. It tries to highlight the |
| In the economist's perfectly | | | | structural realities of a particular industry and the |
| competitive industry, jockeying for position in | | | | extent of competition within that industry. |
| unbridled and entry to the industry very easy. | | | | Through industry analysis, an organization can find |
| This kind of industry structure, of course, offers | | | | whether the chosen field is attractive or not and |
| the worst prospect for long run profitability. The | | | | assess its own position within the industry. |
| weaker the forces, the greater the opportunity | | | | Industry analysis helps firms in the following ways. |
| for superior performance. | | | | - Industy Attractiveness: |
| Whatever their collective | | | | Industry analysis helps to find out: |
| strength, the corporate strategist's goal is to find | | | | 1. the growth potential of the industry, |
| a position in the industry where his or her | | | | 2. the profitability of the industry and |
| company can best defend itself against these | | | | 3. the relative ability of player in that industry. |
| forces or can influence them in its favour. | | | | Where the growth prospects are good and profit |
| Knowledge of these underlying | | | | potential is great, the firm can safely conclude |
| sources of competitive pressure provides the | | | | that the field is attractive and offers enough |
| groundwork for a strategic agenda of action. | | | | room for others to enter and explocit the field. At |
| They highlight the critical strengths and | | | | this stage firm needs to answer certain questions |
| weaknesses of the company, animate the | | | | like: |
| positioning of the company in its industry,. | | | | 1. is it a growing industry? |
| | | | | 2. if yes, at what pace the industry is growing? |
| MICHAEL PORTER'S ANALYSIS: | | | | 3. are there any limits to growth in the industry? |
| According to Michael Porter, | | | | 4. does it offer good returns consistently etc. |
| the nature and degree of competition in an | | | | |
| industry depends on four forces. The threat of | | | | - Competitive Position: |
| new entrants, the bargaining power of suppliers, | | | | Where does the firm stand in comparison to |
| the threat of substitute products or services, and | | | | other in a particular industry. Finding answers to |
| the jockeying among current contestants. To | | | | such a question is important for various reasons. |
| establish a strategic agenda for dealing with these | | | | First, it helps the firm to find its own |
| competing currents and to grow despite them, a | | | | advantageous/disadvantageous place. Second, it |
| company must understand how they operate in | | | | enable the firm to know whether it is able to |
| an industry and how they affect the company in | | | | deliver value for money when compared to |
| its particular situation. | | | | others in the industry. Third, it can think of |
| The strongest competitive force or forces | | | | effecting improvements in its product and service |
| determine the profitability of an industry and so | | | | offerings in an attempt to defend and improve its |
| are of greatest importance in strategy | | | | standing in the market place. |
| formulation. Even a company with a strong | | | | SUMMARY: |
| position in an industry unthreatened by potential | | | | Industry analysis brings to light |
| entrants will earn low returns if it faces a superior | | | | the industry attractiveness and the firm's |
| or a lower cost substitute product. In such a | | | | competitive position within the industry. The |
| situation, coping with the substitute product | | | | nature and degree of competition in an industry |
| becomes the number one strategic priority. A | | | | hinge on five forces: the threat of new entrants, |
| few characteristics are critical to the strength of | | | | the bargaining power of customers, the bargaining |
| each competitive force. | | | | power of suppliers, the threat of substitute |
| 1. Threat of Entry: | | | | products or services, and the jockeying among |
| New entrants to an industry | | | | current contestants. The framework, which |
| bring new capacity, the desire to gain market | | | | consist of seven aspects viz., basic conditions, |
| share, and often substantial resources. The | | | | industry setting/environment, industry structure, |
| seriousness of the threat of entry depends on | | | | industry attraction, industry performance, industry |
| the barriers present and on the reaction from | | | | practice and emerging trends are helpful to do |
| existing competitors that the entrant can expect. | | | | industry analysis. The basic purpose of industry |
| If barriers to entry are high and a new comer | | | | analysis is to assess the relative strengths and |
| can expect sharp retaliation from the entrenched | | | | weakness of an organization relative to other |
| competitors, obviously he will not pose a serious | | | | players in the industry. It tries to highlight the |
| threat of entry. There are six major sources of | | | | structural realities of a particular industry and the |
| barriers to entry. | | | | extent of competition within that industry. |
| 1. Economies of scale – These economies | | | | According to Michael Porter, the nature and |
| deter entry by forcing the aspirant either to | | | | degree of competition in an industry depends on |
| come in on a large scale or to accept a cost | | | | four forces: the threat of new entrants, the |
| disadvantage. Scale economies in production, | | | | bargaining power of suppliers, the threat of |
| research, marketing and service are probably the | | | | substitute products or services, and the jockeying |
| key barriers to entry. Economies of scale can also | | | | among current contestants. |
| act as hurdles in distribution, utilisation of the sales | | | | The experience curve has become widely |
| force, financing and nearly any other part of a | | | | discussed as a key element of industry structure |
| business. | | | | in recent years. According to this curve, unit costs |
| 2. Product Differentiation – Brand identification | | | | in many manufacturing industries, as well as in |
| creates a barrier by forcing entrants to spend | | | | some service industries decline with experience of |
| heavily to overcome customer loyalty. | | | | a particular company's cumulative volume of |
| Advertising, customer service, being first in the | | | | production. |